Software Newsletter #9 - June 29, 2000
1. Sportsman Racers Association
2. FREE Software Download
3. REAL World Technical Support
-- Sportsman Racers Association Update --
For this issue
I'm reprinting, with permission, the latest update from Jeff Teuton of the Sportsman
Racers Association as follows:
To: All Members, Division Directors,
From: Jeff Teuton
was formed in late 1997 to promote better relations between the Sportsman Racer
and NHRA. It started over lack of seating at the Memphis Nationals in the fall
of that year. I am sad to report that the relations between the Sportsman and
NHRA have not improved to anywhere near what I had hoped and worked for over the
last few years.
I am a Chrysler dealer and have been for over 30 years.
I have also been on the Dealer Council for most of that time. I tried to model
the SRA after that council arrangement because it was similar in nature and had
produced many excellent results and kept the lines of communication open at all
times between the dealers (Sportsman) and Chrysler (NHRA). We as dealers present
issues to Chrysler which they then answer in writing and act on accordingly. We
don't always get what we want, but we always get an answer--in writing--so we
at least know what direction the company is going. Communication and action from
NHRA is almost non-existent except in cases where some official gets angry with
racers such as the horsepower issue and the noise or muffler issue.
people feel the Sportsman are going to be eliminated in favor of a professional
only venue, in spite of printed and verbal offerings from Graham Light and Tom
Compton. Initially I did not feel this was the case, if for no other reason than
money. The price we pay to race, paid in advance, covers many of the expenses
of a National Event before the spectator shows up. I must say recent actions by
NHRA lead most members including myself to believe we are quite expendable.
Seating: We now have a seat at National
events. It usually isn't monitored for racers and manufacturers only as was its
original intent, but doesn't seem to be a problem.
sucks. We pay, the pros park. They park motor homes, beer gardens, cafeterias
& God only knows what else. No improvement and actually worse for us than when
we started. Let it rain and it is the Sportsman who get shuffled, often without
regard for our equipment. There is much room for improvement here, but without
some sanctions against the pro racers, nothing will be accomplished.
Electronic Violations: Not much attempt to regulate the cheaters. No real
commitment to catch anyone in spite of one device even being patented. I really
believe in one month I could have the cheaters out or so scared the advantage
Ladder for Competition: We have a pro-ladder
in competition for Stock, Super Stock and Comp. This is the only example of where
a survey of the racers showed our preference for this ladder and NHRA reacted.
Their survey reflected the figures the SRA had compiled. Super Comp and Super
Gas would still like first round paring. Seems many Super Racers feel the first
round random paring is not so random in favor of the traveling sportsman "pro".
Consistent Rules: Still a problem after many request for all kinds
of rule standardization. Nothing in site. No communication.
Truck/Comp: NHRA is just recognizing that some PST racers are altering the
setup in Comp. I think there will be a special class for PST in Comp. I don't
know if this is acceptable to the regular comp racers. Comp is trying its best
to disappear because of the cost and the regulation. The much loved CIC system
(by NHRA) will destroy Comp unless something is done.
We have asked to extend the two year rule on seat belts. Other racing bodies are
not nearly so stringent. If you remember I had a test lab pull on two year old
belts. I have the certificate showing they pulled out of the hardware at 12,500
lbs. After being reassembled, they still look like new. I know this is a safety
factor, but this is overkill.
Fuel Cell in Stock: Speaking of
safety issues, there is absolutely no advantage to a fuel cell except safety and
NHRA will not even consider this. The story I get is to keep the cost of Stock
Eliminator down. Ludicrous at best. When an A/SA rotated the rear axle assembly
last year in Orlando and opened the fuel tank (with 15 gallons in it) like a can
opener, cost wasn't a factor. No answer of any kind on this issue.
& Pinion Steering in pure Super Stock: Again speaking of safety, there are
cars going 150 MPH after a really big wheelstand with the steering going through
the middle of the headers. These 30 year old cars could use some safety help.
No answer of any kind on this issue also.
Deep Staging: Super
class aren't allowed to deep stage and the majority of Super Racers are happy
with this arrangement. Stock and Super Stock can legally deep stage, but a majority
voted against deep staging altogether. From reading their reasons, it seems most
of the concern is not necessarily with deep staging itself, but how staging is
done. There is one method in National Events and a different one in FM Events.
I attempted to reconcile this problem by speaking to Rick Stewart because it seems
the National system is what racers object to. Instead of working with the Sportsman,
Rick told me to "Read page 182 of the (1998) rule book". The last person to give
me an answer like that (and walk away) was one of my illiterate instructors in
college many years ago. It is commonly known that Rick is not a fan of Sportsman
Racers and it really showed in that instance. Another one of the many items that
could be standardized at absolutely no cost.
Generally has improved and appreciated by the Sportsman Racer. Class scheduling
is important to actual track surface and there seems to be more effort on this
and surface both. Under this title I include lights and timing equipment. I know
Jeff Foster does keep the stuff working at Nationals and the Divisionals races
have their own people for this. I do have a track question. There are several
known instances where the front of the car takes the finish beam instead of the
front wheel. My understanding of the lights is that the start beam is 1 1/2" from
the center crown of the track and the finish beam is 5 1/2 inches from the center
crown of the track. However in General Regulations 4:5 it states that a car only
has to have 3 inches ground clearance in front of the front tire. Maybe I'm getting
a little old, but this doesn't quite seem right.
Computer Stock Classes:
I have corresponded many times on this subject even to the point of analyzing
the entire two years of racing to show what the effect of these cars and outlining
the classes with no participation that might be considered. Either way, there
has been no response; official or otherwise.
Horsepower and Indexes:
After two years of correspondence, phone calls and one visit to California,
I thought we had reached a workable agreement on HP and Indexes at the Gatornationals
in March, 2000. It basically adjusted the truck indexes and front wheel drive
indexes in Stock and set up a 3 time hit for HP if your combination went too fast.
The mark was l.05 under in SS and l.l5 under in Stock. Each year started out with
zero hits. There was a procedure for HP reductions that was an important part
of that rule. The basics are now being published for comment. They also have a
provision for index driven classes in S/S. It is National Events only and only
using the final qualifying sheet. And it is supposed to be published. As I said,
I thought his was done in Gainesville, but as of the Houston Nationals this year
and the Baton Rouge Divisional, it had not gotten to the Competition Committee.
I expect this to become a rule soon. It also provided for increases three times
yearly and reductions once yearly. Increases and reductions would be automatic
based on data.
Noise and Mufflers: The highlight of everyone's
day. The recent article in National Dragster is about as user friendly as a mad
alligator. First and foremost is the fact that NHRA was just not truthful in its
correspondence and statements to me about this issue. In a letter dated Aug. 27,
l998, Graham Light said "We should refer to this as a noise attenuation rule,
not a muffler rule. The fact is, if the car is less than the maximum dB level,
it will be accepted without mufflers." The May 26, 2000 article refers to "no
attempts at muffling their (Stk. & S/S Racers) cars." Item 4 in the same article
says that only mufflers will be considered "legitimate" devices. This article
runs on about mufflers and basically says the racers have done nothing about any
of this stuff. I certainly would like to know just what NHRA thinks we have been
doing. We just proved on the Cajun Flyer (SS/AA 4442) that the dB level was lowered
by 3 by timing and fuel changes. We tested 12 S/S cars in Hallsville and all passed.
One of the cars tested by SRA with a 93 dB level, tested 96 at another location
about 500' up the return road. Div. 4 officials agreed to retest the car later
with their meter and mine. As a matter of fact we actually had four meters; three
Radio Shack and one of much better quality. The same car tested 95 in neutral,
and 94 in park; quite legal. There are several problems with the noise/muffler
issue. One big problem is the inconsistency in the testing. Our car (SS/AA 4442)
is a good example. We tested 97 in Dallas and 94 in Hallsville. The real truth
about this issue is that NHRA has no desire to help a racer to pass without mufflers.
The Super Class racers reacted too easily, especially Super Gas as most of those
cars will pass without mufflers. They want Stock and SS to do the same. I understand
the about 15% of the Super Class cars will still not pass. A couple of noise tidbits;
DOT Part 325 -- Compliance with Interstate Motor Carrier Noise Emission Standards
allows 2 dB higher when stationary testing is done on hard surface (asphalt, cement,
hard dirt, gravel). DOT also allows a 1 dB higher standard at 48 ft. as opposed
to 50 ft.; A paper published by SAE (1999-01-1743) discusses Site Calibration
on page 704. SCCA developed a data base on noise and compares readings with data
from many locations. Their statement "The readings are significantly higher than
the master data base, Try another location". This subject could go on for days.
NHRA has not been truthful about their intentions on this subject so why should
we expect anything in the way of straightforward testing and regulation.
As I stated in the first paragraph, the relations between
NHRA and the Sportsman Racer has not improved in the last few years. The muffler
issue is just the last in a series of issues that has indicated the lack of need
or respect for the Sportsman Racer by NHRA. We still have little or no communication
because they don't communicate. The reason for the time between newsletters is
nothing to tell because they don't communicate. In the beginning I asked Phil
Burgess for space in National Dragster to communicate with all the racers on a
regular basis, but of course this has not been granted or even answered for that
matter. I had really hoped for issues to be surveyed either by NHRA or SRA and
actions taken accordingly and this information disseminated through National Dragster.
Sound simple? The sad truth is that NHRA is strictly an entertainment company
and not a racing sanction. The new TV schedule is the king and there will be no
adjustment done to accommodate the Sportsman. The schedule at present has S/G,
S/C, S/ST, Stk. & S/S running early to accommodate the TV schedule. I personally
told Tom Compton and Lynwood Dupuy that this was not good for us. I asked for
some changes which have not come. Too many unanswered questions and too many adverse
decisions lead me to believe we should look for another sanction for racing or
form our own. Federal Mogul has not stepped up for anything except the FMFC and
FMD classes. I wrote Tom Compton a few months ago and asked that NHRA participate
in a new series for S/ST, S/G, S/C, Stk, & S/S with seven National Events to be
conducted at better tracks in each division. Since spectators don't seem to understand
us anyway, make it a racers race. I think we could get at least 500 participants
at each event. I have never received an answer. Perhaps we should to look to IHRA
or NMCA or NSCA or a promoter such as George Howard (18 B & M Races) or perhaps
a manufacturer or seller of performance parts. We are a very large market for
parts and equipment. If we had our own sanction or were sanctioned by someone
other than NHRA, the items listed in this paper and numerous items not listed
could be answered. I will mail this to a list of manufacturers I have as well
as several media people I have gotten to know over the past few years.
Any ideas, suggestions, or answers would be greatly appreciated.
Teuton, email: firstname.lastname@example.org
-- FREE Software Download --
Our DataMaster Analyzer software,
Version 2.0, is available to you as a FREE download on our web site. You don't
need a data recorder to test the software and see exactly what a DataMaster Sportsman
Computer does better than any other data logger system in the world! If you have
any older version of this software, download this as a FREE update.
REAL World Technical Support --
With Family Software, you'll get better technical support than anywhere
on the planet. Why? Because, I design and program all of Family Software's
products and I use them all on my own very competitive Super Comp dragster.
All of my 30+ years of experience and knowledge is available to you
and our other customers. Try to find that kind of information at any
one of our competitors. You won't be able to, I guarantee it! Family
Software cares about the racer and his/her success as a racer. The other
companies just want your money!
-- Secure Ordering --
You can safely order directly from
our web site. All of your information is handled on our Secure Server. We have
now been registered with the Public Eye. You can check our ratings by clicking
on the Public Eye link on our Home Page or Order Form.
you have questions or topics that you would like to see covered in this newsletter,
please Email them to me.
Family Software - Drag Racing Computers and Software
[ Back To Top ]
[ Home ][
Products ][ Contact Us
][ Articles ][ Links ][ Photos
][ Downloads ]
Copyright 2000, Family Software. All rights reserved.